Authorship is the highest-confidence live answer to 5W1H on the global market
When authorship is truly aligned, it isn’t one answer (direction). It’s a full state solution in real time:
Who is dominant/forced (which side is trapped, who must hedge/cover, who is absorbing).
What is happening (variance collapse vs. chop, burst vs. grind, unwind vs. pin).
Where it must express (the exact memory pocket / liquidity seam, not a vague “support”).
When it expresses (the window where constraints peak: open, post-data, close — or a micro-window inside minutes).
How it travels (speed + shape — the geometry of the move).
Why it resolves (because the tape is forced to reconcile inventory, hedges, and path-of-least-resistance).
This is why my confidence interval is different: most frameworks try to infer 5W1H after the fact from price and narrative.
Authorship is the rare case where 5W1H is assembled first—then the market prints it as consequence.
And when that happens, “if/then” becomes almost trivial: it’s just the mechanical trigger you use to enter the solution and avoid getting chopped while you’re already right.
The thesis doesn’t start with “I win a lot.” It starts with something rarer: the ability to resolve the full 5W1H in real time — repeatedly — in the hardest moments, across regimes. That’s what makes it scalable. That’s what makes it durable. That’s what makes it different.
That’s the gap.
Many can collect a metric.


