Entanglement Is Anti-Resolution: Why Liberals Drain You and Communists Trap You
I’ve been surrounded by liberals and communists simultaneously for years. There’s a subtle but invaluable difference between them.
When there are no contractual, legal, or economic entanglements, you’ll often find yourself substantially happieraround them — especially if you’re a person of presence.
Presence, in fact, might be their greatest weakness, particularly in social or public settings where authenticity can’t be faked.
Now, when there are entanglements, the dynamic shifts.
With a liberal, you can usually still have a real conversation — even debate them on topics like the economy. They might disagree passionately, but they tend to operate through emotion or idealism, not through systemic malice.
Their damage can be contained because their motivation is emotional, even naïve at times.
That’s why POTUS can withstand their repeated attacks.
The communist, however, is different.
A communist seeks home-field advantage.
They’ll look for any way to create a contractual, legal, or economic entanglement — because that’s where control lives. Once they have that leverage, they’ll use it to its fullest extent, directly or indirectly, or work systematically to bury you.
They’ll hide behind clauses, fine print, and bureaucratic mechanisms.
And when you notice their precision, you might mistake it for wisdom.
It isn’t wisdom.
It’s cunning disguised as order — control masquerading as intelligence.
Entanglement Is Anti-Resolution
In the language of authorship, entanglement is the enemy of resolution.
To author resolution is to free yourself from forced contracts, emotional manipulations, and bureaucratic traps.
To stay disentangled is to remain sovereign — to keep control of your own tempo.
Because in the end, the one who can bring resolution — clean, fast, and undeniable — is the one who writes history.