REVOLT: America v The United States
The source of funds or income is a significant indicator—it reveals a lot about you. For example, did you receive it, or did you earn it? If you earned it, how did you go about it? What did you have to do to earn it—objectively?
Did you earn it as part of the managerial class, or did you inherit it? Or did you find legal ways to beat the system, positioning yourself as part of the counter-elite—sufficiently funded to be a revolutionary?
If you are part of the counter-elite, you inherently despise the establishment elite because they do not share your character—and vice versa. This is why you have the potential to be a revolutionary or a “1776er.”
A 1776er is the revolutionary of America, as opposed to the bureaucrats of 1789 (implementation of federalism - The United States) or 1914 (centralization) —a bureaucracy that has now aligned itself with industries like the media, the British Commonwealth, and other major globalist institutions.
This is now a game of attrition—one that should be played to defund and push the establishment elite to the brink.
What should never have made sense to you is how a billionaire politician could be outspent by, say, the Democratic left or a lower-net-worth politician. This became evident when Kamala Harris spent $1.5 billion.
What’s becoming clear is that the establishment elite derives much of its funding through bureaucracy and credentialism—perhaps why they hold both in such high esteem. The only way to purge that system is to eradicate their original source of funding, just as they would naturally do to you. This is why you must throw the table.
Throw the table in their face.
Sometimes, you need to employ techniques that invert or subvert expectations—mocking corporate norms, exposing absurdities in management, or flipping conventional wisdom for humor and critique.
There is a lot of criticism about high levels of uncertainty, but shouldn’t we view all uncertainty as an opportunity—unless your operating income depends on globalization for predictable earnings?
Wouldn’t it be wise to keep the ‘globalists’ on their toes? It’s clear that globalists, leftists, and bureaucrats, individually, have shallower pockets or are more dependent on the system than the right, as most are part of the managerial class.
Therefore, 1776 them!
Fun fact, Russia supported the American Revolution pre and post. They were a small trading partner at the time.
More Globalist Uncertainty
Today is a complete rewind of yesterday. Despite the outcry and bullish sentiment, there hasn’t been any follow-through on the tape. Additionally, projected rate cuts for next week have been all but eradicated.
On top of that, a trade war with the EU is about to commence, with tit-for-tat actions reminiscent of what happened in North America. This EU-North American trade conflict also carries broader implications for NATO, which in turn ties into the war in Ukraine.
