SUPERSET: The Most Consequential Body of Work
Who in finance has ever shown this level of diversity of ideas?
Who in finance has ever demonstrated this level of precision?
Who in finance has ever exercised this level of control over what was once believed to be the most uncontrollable domain?
Not an academic could do this — an academic would still be waiting for validation. They’d be trapped in journals, in peer review, in committees. By the time their model got approved, the market would already have moved on.
Not the Street either. They would be mobilizing entire research desks, PM teams, analysts, and execution squads — burning resources just to approximate what a single operator has already authored live.
I do the analysis.
I do the PM work.
I do the research.
I do the trading and the execution.
No sales desk is required. The market itself pays attention.
And ask yourself this: who else is producing work this consequential?
Everyone else is playing in subsets — clever factor models, marginal trade ideas, “insights” that only nibble at the edges.
This is the superset.
Both intellectually and practically, everything else folds into it.
That’s why the very fact you are witnessing it — across analogies, across trades, across doctrine — is the evidence.
It isn’t hidden.
It isn’t theoretical.
It’s right in front of your eyes.