The 4 Questions They Cannot Answer
Is the accidental killing of 170 schoolchildren a justifiable cost in the name of “liberating” a regime?
Is the shutdown of the Middle East—its trade, energy flows, and civilian stability—worth the same objective?
Why frame this in hypotheticals when the risks are already well-defined? There are only a handful of nuclear-armed states with clear “first use” mandates. They are are greater ‘risk’ - why not strike them?
And yet, one of the central assumptions behind this strategy remains unfulfilled:
Where is the civil uprising in Iran?
They wouldn’t dare debate me.