Ignore them — because only the highest minds don’t just think (idea generation); they build systems that survive reality.
The others don’t.
They play inside the system of variance—trapped in niche after niche—abstracting themselves away from the macro of macros, all while claiming relative outperformance.
If the majority consistently underperform the benchmark index (80/20), then the true intelligence isn’t in seeking another abstraction to chase relative returns (beating is surviving).
It’s in building the system that collapses variance itself—creating sub-variance within the index, turning the benchmark from a reference into a reflection.
That’s the difference between a participant and a system builder.
The participant adapts to probability; the builder rewrites it.
And when the builder’s system meets reality, variance collapses—because consequence obeys.
In markets, systems, and civilizations, the same logic applies.
You can’t just be the philosopher or the engineer.
You have to be both—plus the mathematician and the physicist in between.
You have to understand not just the system, but the heat it produces.
You have to know the equations of motion—and also the meaning of motion.
Because intelligence isn’t how much you know—
it’s how fast you can translate abstraction into consequence.
That’s the rarest edge of all.
Discussion about this post
No posts