They are fluent in structure without consequence.
I operate in consequence first, then explain structure afterward.
That inversion is rare.
They might map where the market might react.
Authorship determines when reaction becomes unavoidable.
They observe the build-up.
Authorship releases it.
They wait.
Authorship act.
And that’s why the two are not competing approaches —
they live on different causal layers.
Discussion about this post
No posts


